Has big tech pushed my favorite watchmaker out? Exploring Fossil’s goodbye

My reliable Fossil timepiece, still ticking after all these years (and let’s be honest, still looking pretty sharp), is a testament to that fact. So, when I heard Fossil was entering the smartwatch game, I was fully on board. Style + technology? Count me in.

However, like that regrettable frosted tips trend, Fossil’s smartwatch adventure didn’t quite achieve cult status. In 2024, the company departed from the market, which made me want to investigate further into the situation. Let’s dig in.

First and foremost, if you are not familiar with the company (I am sure not everyone is such a huge fan), you should be aware that Fossil is a trendy American watch and accessory company established in 1984. It is recognized for its fashionable and conventional watches, and lately, it had expanded into the smartwatch market.

 
Back in 2015, Fossil saw the smartwatch trend coming and decided to jump on it. It joined the Wear OS trend, offering intelligent versions of its classic designs. Fossil smartwatches operate on Wear OS by Google, which is an OS that is compatible with Android smartphones as well as with iOS, for that matter.

Fossil’s smartwatch collection is a fashion display on your wrist. Fossil watches come in a range of styles that mix fashion with technology, so you can discover one that matches your personal preference. They pack in a selection of features frequently found in other smartwatches, including:

However, a slick design and a variety of features might not be the correct recipe for success, especially when the watch’s battery life is not as long as some other smartwatches, the Wear OS is buggy at times, and it is more expensive than some of its rivals.

Talking about rivals, this is where things got a bit… rocky. Competition was fierce. Tech giants like Apple and Samsung were the leading figures of the smartwatch world, leaving Fossil feeling more like the awkward relative at the family reunion. Nevertheless, the smartwatch scene was unexplored territory for Fossil, while Apple, for instance, already had established brand loyalty in the tech world.

that 80% of iPhone users who possess smartwatches choose an Apple Watch, leaving the other 20% to contemplate alternative brands like Fossil. Fossil’s compatibility with both Android and iOS makes it an option for iPhone users who aren’t drawn to the design of the Apple Watch. Personally, I can’t see myself wearing an Apple Watch, even though I use an iPhone; its design just doesn’t appeal to me. That’s why I was glad when Fossil entered the market with its stylish options.

It’s not every day that a conventional watchmaker steps into the tech world. As mentioned earlier, that’s what made Fossil smartwatches stand out – they brought that classic watchmaker flair to the tech scene. Unlike a lot of other smartwatches that scream “tech gadget,” Fossil watches offer that timeless watch design.

 
But again, here comes the software. Well, let’s just say Wear OS wasn’t exactly known for its user-friendliness on devices different than Google’s and Samsung’s. Bugs and limitations compared to its competitors left some users feeling more frustrated than accidentally hitting reply-all on a work email (shudder).

 
You can check out my colleague’s experience with the Fossil Gen 6, for instance, which was not only annoying in terms of software performance but also literally gave him a skin burn. After all, Fossil is a watchmaker. Not a software engineer. And it shows (as much as I don’t want to admit it). 

Fossil’s farewell

By 2024, the writing was on the smartwatch screen. Fossil, with a heavy heart (and maybe a sigh of relief), announced its exit from the smartwatch market. The reasons were a mix of the Wear OS issues, fierce competition from tech giants like Apple and Samsung, and a strategic shift back to its core business: timeless watches and accessories.

 
In a statement, Fossil spokesperson Amanda Castelli said:

It was a bittersweet moment for fans of the brand, but let’s be honest, it wasn’t entirely unexpected. The Gen 6 is the latest smartwatch series, and it was released around 3 years ago. The lack of new smartwatch models since 2021 signaled Fossil’s gradual retreat from the market.

 
Fossil has assured users that it will provide updates for its existing Wear OS smartwatches for a few more years, offering some relief for current owners. However, once the updates cease, your smartwatch may become just a fossil waiting to be discovered by future generations around your home.

Circle back to the core issue

Let’s circle back to the core issue here. I touched upon the software challenges, which might leave you pondering why Wear OS doesn’t quite deliver the same level of performance on Fossil devices as it does on competitors like the Pixel Watch or the Galaxy Watch 6.
The answer lies in updates (mostly). The introduction of Wear OS 3 in 2021, built on Android 11, marked a new era for smartwatches running on Google’s software, starting with the Galaxy Watch 4 series. However, smartwatches from Google and Samsung quickly moved on to the next improved Wear OS 4 based on Android 13. Now, there are even rumors that Wear OS 5, built on Android 14, might be coming with the next-gen Galaxy Watch 7.

And yet, the newest Fossil smartwatches, like the Gen 6 series, are still rocking Wear OS 3. And believe it or not, they only got the update last year. Crunch the numbers, and you will see that an OS released in 2021 reaches Fossil (and other brands, mind you) almost two years later. So, yeah, bugs are par for the course.

Annoyingly late Wear OS

Now, you might be wondering, why is that? Well, let’s break it down. There are a couple of factors at play here, starting with the complexity of the Wear OS platform and the intricacies of partnerships and collaborations.

Wear OS is a complex operating system that needs to be customized for various hardware configurations. Each smartwatch manufacturer might use different sensors, processors, and other components, requiring specific adjustments to the OS for each device.

And it seems like Fossil simply didn’t have the expertise to optimize the software for its smartwatches. Users reported encountering numerous bugs, experiencing lag, and sometimes the software didn’t even work properly.

 
This customization journey can take a while because, you know, there are these pesky technical hurdles when tweaking the software for different hardware setups. Plus, there is the ongoing mission to keep that user experience top-notch across all devices.

Getting updates out the door usually means getting everyone on the same page, too – think Google (the brain behind Wear OS), the smartwatch maker (like Fossil), and sometimes other partners (like Qualcomm, the chip guru). But here is the kicker: getting all these players to sync up their interests and schedules can put the brakes on updates.

Things go easier for Google and Samsung, as proven by updated Wear OS often debuting on a Galaxy Watch. Both tech giants teamed up to give Wear OS a serious boost, aiming to speed up app launches, extend battery life, and create a more seamless platform. Their collaboration isn’t just about smartwatches; they are also teaming up to enhance smartphones. Case in point: the latest Galaxy S24 series, packed with AI features straight out of Google’s Pixel playbook.

Apple and Samsung are not easy to compete with

Going head-to-head with the big tech giants is no walk in the park. Stats paint a pretty clear picture – Apple is the heavyweight, holding about 30% of the global smartwatch market share (of course, brand loyalty should be considered here as a factor), with Samsung following at around 10%. Huawei, Amazfit, and Garmin are each snagging around 5% of the market share. Nearly half of all smartwatch sales belong to these tech titans.

 
The rest? Well, they are duking it out for whatever’s left. Some reports suggest hundreds of smartwatch manufacturers worldwide, but pinpointing the exact number of smartwatch manufacturers globally is challenging due to the dynamic nature of the market and varying definitions of “manufacturer.”

The smartwatch market isn’t as massive as you might think. Take the US, for instance – only 12.2% of Americans are rocking a smartwatch or fitness tracker. Zoom out a bit, and the global scene shows about 219.43 million smartwatch users as of 2023. So, slipping off the radar might be quite easy, considering the circumstances.

Lessons learned

What can we learn from Fossil’s smartwatch journey? Well, for starters, it’s a reminder that even the coolest trends can have an expiry date. And that tech giants, with their bottomless pockets and fancy gadgets, are tough competitors to beat. But it also highlights the importance of focusing on core strengths. 

Fossil realized its expertise lies in traditional watches and accessories, and that is where it is doubling down, which is a wise choice if you ask me. Why? For once, spreading efforts across different areas can be resource-intensive. Focusing on traditional watches could allow Fossil to streamline operations, maximize its expertise, and potentially achieve greater efficiency. Otherwise, failing to innovate within its core area could leave Fossil vulnerable to competitors offering novel designs or features in traditional watches.

 
Who knows, maybe the future holds another smartwatch foray for Fossil. Why not in the form of collaboration with one of the big players (I wish)? But until then, we can appreciate the company’s attempt to blend fashion and tech, even if it didn’t quite hit the right note.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *